From the Mailbag:
Do you think de Botton is right about religions having their fingers on the buttons of what makes people better?
I’ve argued extensively in this blog that myth and imagination have a far stronger hold on people than do “rational ethics.” You might argue somebody out of breaking a shop window, but it’s his imaginative apprehension of his place in the universe that will restrain him when nobody is watching.
That might be (and most ordinarily is) in the form of envisioning a God who represents all rightness and who has the power of rewards and punishments when nobody else is there.
But there are other, more important and more subtle features in religion: one’s understanding of one’s place in the world, for instance, and one’s relationship to others. When that’s used for aggression and blind self-love, we get terrorism and fundamentalism. When it’s used for love, we get self-sacrificial people who believe that it really does matter (whatever the rational arguments might conclude) that one should give up one’s life for one’s friends.